Lexique métier

En cours de rédaction

aculturation
adaptive vs. predictive
agile
agregation
API
granularité
BDM business process /data management
big data 3V Volume Variété Vélocité
BIM
blockchain
bots
BPM
BPM business process management
business Intelligence
buttom up
chabots
cobots
complétion taux de … au bout du contenu lu intermédiaire à 10 s
CRM
crowdsourcing
data vizualisation
datalake
déploiement « on-premise »
design thinking
DFPB data flow processing business
DMP data management platforme
embeded embarqué (en natif, d’origine)
empowerment be empowered
essaimage
flow
flux RSS
from scratch
granularité
ideation sensing
insight
iteration
KPI
lean
machine learning
marketing automation
modelisation
out of the box
outils de listening
PaaS
PERT
Predictive Development methods exist on a continuum from adaptive to predictive.[28] Agile software development methods lie on the adaptive side of this continuum. One key of adaptive development methods is a « Rolling Wave » approach to schedule planning, which identifies milestones but leaves flexibility in the path to reach them, and also allows for the milestones themselves to change.[29]
Processus métiers
Projet cible
Real Time Bidding (RTB) Ensemble des campagnes médias achetées aux enchères sur les places de marché
RGPD
scalabilité
scope
scrum
seo sea sem
slack
sprint
time out
user centric
Adaptive methods focus on adapting quickly to changing realities. When the needs of a project change, an adaptive team changes as well. An adaptive team has difficulty describing exactly what will happen in the future. The further away a date is, the more vague an adaptive method is about what will happen on that date. An adaptive team cannot report exactly what tasks they will do next week, but only which features they plan for next month. When asked about a release six months from now, an adaptive team might be able to report only the mission statement for the release, or a statement of expected value vs. cost.
Predictive methods, in contrast, focus on analysing and planning the future in detail and cater for known risks. In the extremes, a predictive team can report exactly what features and tasks are planned for the entire length of the development process. Predictive methods rely on effective early phase analysis and if this goes very wrong, the project may have difficulty changing direction. Predictive teams often institute a change control board to ensure they consider only the most valuable changes.
Risk analysis can be used to choose between adaptive (agile or value-driven) and predictive (plan-driven) methods.[30] Barry Boehm and Richard Turner suggest that each side of the continuum has its own home ground, as follows:[31]